Roy,
My process - hmmmm at what age?
At age 14 to 42, I wrote everything on my kitchen table. Pencil and manuscript. As a staff arranger at the
Army Field Band, I wrote with piano and large full scores and tons of number 2 pencils. Like you, I
am a ham-fisted pianist to say the least. When Finale came out, I was thoroughly old-fashioned and
ignored their program, figuring I was too old to start learning something new. But... after getting
out of the Army in 1993, age 41, I bought the first power Mac and begin learning about Midi.
Today, I still play around on the piano until something strikes me as interesting and notate it either
in my mind or on a piece of manuscript. I am not ashamed to use the computer as a composing tool
like some major composers, as if it is some kind of short cut. That's just "crap". If Beethoven
or Mahler were alive, trust me, they were efficient composers with their time and would have
utilized all the tools at their disposal to make their composition process faster.
I use a lot of sketches on finale, i.e. Sketch 1 - intro, Sketch 2 - transition to
exposition, etc.. I find that once I come up with something on the keyboard, I can quickly notate
it on Finale and just work on many different variations of the material until I feel I have exhausted
all the different approaches to the composition problem, and once I am satisfied that I have the
best result, move that to the final sketch on this section. I do this for about a week on a piece
until I begin to see the form and ideas begin to mesh. I sometimes write a condensed score to
see how the piece lays out.
I try to come up with an ending as soon as I can or at least have an idea of how I
would like to end the piece. McBeth says that if you don't know where you are going, your piece
will just ramble on; like traveling in a car with no destination.
Each time I write, I find that I do different things, I am getting to be much faster
in my thought process and faster at putting things together using Finale. I take more time now to
listen to a .wav file of what I have written so far, or just turn my back to the score as it is
played back. This helps to "feel" if the piece is "right" or does it need more material, less material,
more transitions, or more impact, etc. to make the idea come to fruition.
My music has become more contrapuntal and more linear as I continue to write. I have
lately become more frugal about textures and doublings. I want to use more colors and experiment more
with textures. But in the end, I love a good melody, and don't apologize for that. I want to write
music that has depth and meaning, a novel if you will, not a comic book or a car chase. There is
simply too many composers out there feeding the educational establishment with candy. I like
"meat and potatoes" or as James Barnes once said to an educator who said his music was too hard,
"I write music for musicians."
I can't exactly tell you how I do things; I believe as many composers do, that there
is a divine spirit, God I think, who moves through us to communicate great truths through music.
It is a gift that I cherish, and only wish I had first followed my earlier ambitions to be a composer
when I was your age. Instead, I chose a different route. I suppose I have no regrets except that one.
I just turned 54, but as a composer about 30. I really cherish our friendship and your willingness
to share your thoughts about composing and music in general.
Take care of yourself and God Bless You and your fiance'. Please stay in touch and
PLEASE don't let anything get in the way of composing like I did.
Your friend,
Chuck
October 21, 2005
Letter to composer, James Barnes:
"Jim,
I [Chuck Booker] was reading the biography of Samuel Barber and came
across this letter from Samuel Barber's uncle (Homer, himself a composer) written to
Samuel Barber in January 1933:"
"So often we begin to compose in a spirit of fearfulness. We are
fearful of our listener. Will he understand? Will he be impressed? Will
he be moved? Must I dazzle him, or write down to his comprehension?
This consciousness of listener, publisher, or conductor can be a real
impediment to profound, spontaneous work....The very distractions of
the ideal way in which you are living will make it hard for you to
compose... The subconscious fear of interruption and the sense of
limited time are both nuisances... Your work will depend, in a measure,
on the men you know, on the taste and perception you encounter, on your
own selection of influence."
Response of James Barnes to Chuck Booker:
"Hacks follow trends. Good composers set the pathway for ensembles to grow by challenging them to reach for what they SHOULD be able to play, not just what they CAN play. If the music is good, the audience will always understand."
Jim